Current issues and events

Dr. Nathan Thompson worked with a patient who had type-2 diabetes. The patient told the doctor he had to get vaccinated to keep his job. While he didn’t want to do it, he needed the job.

Because the doctor had treated him, he had a history of the man’s blood tests which enabled the doctor to establish a baseline for what was a healthy immune system. Dr. Thompson had his patient take blood tests after the first and second COVID shots to see if the blood work was altered.

Dr. Thompson said, his “jaw dropped after seeing the blood test results following the second shot.”

The results alarmed Doctor Thompson so much that he made [a] video . . . .  The blood work showed a serious negative impact on the natural immune system of the patient.

His patient is now more at risk after the vaccination. The antibodies that protect against cancer and other illnesses were compromised. Dr. Thompson has no idea how long this vaccine-induced autoimmune compromise will last in his patient.

You've got major Standup style! . . .  In particular, you'll ruffle feathers if it means getting a laugh and you're not one to shy away from being the target of a joke. It's likely that you believe that almost everything can be joked about and you enjoy poking fun at your friends.

However, you differ from most Standups in that your healthy sense of skepticism is baked into your style of humor and you prefer uplifting humor. By nature, when you're telling a joke, you can rarely keep a straight face and your sense of humor is an acquired taste; if people get your humor, they really get your humor.

Some people are naturally funny, but let’s not worry about them. They’re doing their own thing. Like how some people are naturally great runners, but that’s no reason not to be jogging.

But what’s important is that humor isn’t about being funny.  It’s not about cracking jokes; it’s about being human, and cultivating a mindset where joy comes more easily. What unlocks most people here is gaining more insight into their humor style.

We have a quiz (a fun kind) that people can take to understand their style. Most people naturally fall into one or two of these four styles.

* Stand-Ups are bold, irreverent, and unafraid to ruffle a few feathers for a laugh. Think Amy Schumer and Eddie Murphy.

* Sweethearts are earnest, honest, understated, and tend to use humor that lightens the mood rather than tears others down (e.g., Bowen Yang Jimmy Kimmel).

* Snipers are edgy, sarcastic, nuanced, and are masters of the unexpected dig (e.g., Michelle Wolf, Bill Burr).

* Magnet: Expressive, charismatic, sometimes even goofy, and easy to make laugh (e.g,. Jimmy Fallon and Ellen Degeneres).

Knowing your style helps you bring it out more naturally, use it more adeptly, and lead more authentically. Plus, it will make you a better jogger.    

I'm feeling all messed up,
I have a voice inside my head,
It says turn to the left, then it says turn to the right.
Don't want to bring you down,
But I am really needing guidance now . . . .

So when you're feeling kind of mixed up,
Just remember it's a mixed-up world,
And when you're feeing life is just too tough,
Just remember you're a real tough girl.

I have had two patients who have developed significant neuropathy in the arm where [they] got the covid injection. One is 38, works in construction, and has not been able to work in the last 5 months. The other is retired but severe impact on quality of life.

My primary care panel is nearly 3,000 patients.  I am not aware of a single patient or personal contact who has died of covid. I have seen hundreds of patients who have had covid. I had a few who had some long symptoms for a few months. However i have a list of dozens of patients who have had significant adverse events after the vaccine. I also have personal contacts w myocarditis and transverse myelitis.

In my clinic it is overtly hostile from the administrative side toward unvaxxed. Most docs/staff also radically pro vax. I have tried to bring up a few just minor points and have really had people blow up at me. A colleague of mine saw my 38 year old patient before i did. Guy came in the day after the vax, guy is strong as a horse and no med history and he is like "i cant move my arm." Other doc is like, totally cant be the vax. Then i see him and im like, obviously was the vax. I have a few supporting staff who i have come to know also didnt get vax but we are few and far between. most docs wearing around "vaccinated" pins on their white coats. Going to work now feels like playing a character in a dystopian novel.

You are given three doors to choose from.  Behind one is a car and behind the other two are goats.  After you’ve chosen one but haven’t opened it, game show host Monty reveals the location of a goat from behind one of the other two doors.  If you want the car, should you stick with your original choice or switch?

Solution:

Just eat out.  A LOT.    

In a new study led by the University of Iowa, people who ate restaurant food twice a day had a 49 percent higher risk of mortality at any point in time, compared to people who ate out less than once a week.  Previous studies might help to explain why:  one of them, a 2015 analysis published in the European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, reports that even though some establishments provide healthy food, restaurant fare is usually less balanced than home-cooked meals . . . even when it's not fast food.  And while it's hard to know exactly what cooks are putting into your food at a restaurant, at home you're aware of your meals' ingredients and their proportions.  

Who Was Michael Anthony Granata? It's Getting So Bad The Dying Have To Write SOS Messages In Their Own Obituaries Telling How They Really Died . . .

Michael, a longtime resident of Gilroy, passed away on November 1, 2021.  Never a kinder more gentle man did I know than my husband, Michael. . . .

Mike was adamant that people know what happened to him that caused his early and unexpected death.  Message from Mike: “Many nurses and non-nursing staff begged me and my wife to get the truth out to the public about the Covid-19 vaccines because the truth of deaths from the vaccine was being hidden within the medical profession. I promised I would get the message out.  So, here is my message: I was afraid of getting the vaccine for fear that I might die. At the insistence of my doctor, I gave in to pressure to get vaccinated.  On August 17th I received the Moderna vaccine and starting feeling ill three days later. I never recovered but continued to get worse. I developed multisystem inflammation and multisystem failure that medical professionals could not stop. My muscles disappeared as if to disintegrate. I was in ICU for several weeks and stabbed with needles up to 24 times a day for those several weeks, while also receiving 6 or 7 IVs at the same time (continuously). It was constant torture that I cannot describe. I was no longer treated as a human with feelings and a life. I was nothing more than a covid vaccine human guinea pig and the doctors [were] excited to participate in my fascinating progression unto death. If you want to know more, please ask my wife.  I wished I would have never gotten vaccinated. If you are not vaccinated, don’t do it unless you are ready to suffer and die.”

My friend is a nurse, she has seen an alarming amount of miscarriages, still born’s, the placenta is turning to mush. Also an alarming number of women just dying in there 30’s for no apparent reasons. It’s heart breaking. I’ve had a miscarriage it’s devastating, never felt so empty inside in my life, my husband suffered the loss along side me, it was his baby too. Sorry for you and your wife’s loss.

My daughter knows two women in their 30’s who died within days of their 2nd shot.

Its insanity, four teachers have died in a week in one region in Ohio - how long are people going to keep pretending this is not happening:

https://www.wcpo.com/news/local-news/four-area-teachers-die-days-apart

BEFORE EATING . . .

Say grace

Giving thanks before eating doesn’t just leave you contented—a Harvard study suggests it blocks bloat too!  Your gut and brain are linked via the vagus nerve, which acts like a telephone line that keeps them in constant communication.  And prayer triggers a relaxation response that curbs the release of bloat-triggering stress hormones.  Georgetown University Medical Center research found that a 2-minute gratitude break before eating increases the production of bloat-busting digestive enzymes by 22%.

A group that investigates taxpayer-funded experiments on animals has disclosed a document exposing the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases’ (NIAID) “excruciating experiments” on rhesus monkeys. . . .

The document obtained by the group reveals that NIAID has spent $13.5 million in taxpayer funding on experiments that involve injecting the monkeys with various infectious diseases, such as Ebola and the Lassa virus that results in hemorrhaging, pain, brain damage, loss of motor control, and organ failure.

Dr. Anthony Fauci is the director of NIAID, a division of the National Institute of Health (NIH), itself a part of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

“In many of these experiments, Fauci and staff intentionally withhold pain relief, even though these are some of the most excruciating experiments in the federal government,” Goodman said.

WCWP also recently exposed NIAID’s experiments on beagles, which involved having sandflies eat the dogs alive, as well as experiments that involved force-feeding 44 beagle puppies an experimental drug before killing and dissecting them. . . .

“It’s very unlikely that Fauci didn’t know about this, given the amount of money involved and the fact that these experiments are happening in his own laboratories,” Goodman said. “These aren’t being contracted somewhere else. They are happening in his own house. If he’s going to get credit for any good he does, he needs to get blamed for any bad that’s happening on his watch as well.  The buck stops with him, and he’s certainly responsible.” . . .

Vaccine research is the reason given for some of the experimentation. However, despite their biological similarities to humans, NIH has stated that nine out of 10 drugs that pass tests on animals fail in humans because they don’t work or they’re dangerous, according to Goodman. . . .

WCWP has also exposed six different beagle experiments that Fauci has funded.

In one of the procedures highlighted, NIAID staff performed a “cordectomy,” which involves cutting a dog’s vocal cords so that it can’t bark, howl, or cry during an experiment. . . .

Dr. Tiffani Milless, a pathologist and medical adviser to WCWP, said that “infecting nonhuman primates with painful and debilitating illnesses with the goal of curing humans is not just cruel, but it’s incredibly wasteful.”

There's too many men.
Too many people,
Making too many problems,
And not much love to go round.
Can't you see,
This is a land of confusion?!

When we’re confused by something—say with a movie plot or calculus—we tend to feel uncomfortable, frustrated. But maybe we should embrace the confusion. Because a new study finds that confusion can lead to better learning.

Scientists set up a situation where they purposely confused subjects during a pretend learning session.

The subjects watched an animated tutor and student discuss possible flaws in a scientific study. The researchers had the animated tutor and student disagree with each other on specific flaws.  But to set up a really confusing situation for one group of subjects they also had the pretend tutor and student make incorrect or contradictory statements about the study. Then the subjects had to decide which of the two opinions had more scientific merit.

Subjects who were forced to deal with the incorrect and contradictory statements did significantly better on later tests where they had to spot flaws in studies, as opposed to those subjects who only faced the disagreements between the animated tutor and student. The study will be published in the journal Learning and Instruction.

Researchers note that confusion motivates us to work harder to understand, and so we gain a deeper and more comprehensive knowledge of a subject.

Never in my life have I felt such disdain for the stupidity of my fellow human beings.

I'm talking about anyone age 15 or so and older who actually believes all the bullsh** they're being fed about this #scamdemic.

I'm talking about people that are willfully ignorant. Do you watch the television news?  Do you believe what they're telling you?  If so, you're a f-ing idiot.  Sorry for the harsh language, but you are. And it's about time somebody called you out on it. . . .

If the U.S. were ever to get into a war with another superpower, I'm almost certain we'd get our asses kicked. The people of this country have become weak, pathetic little cowards. And our so-called leaders are the worst ones of all. Where's the pushback [against] all this madness?

As Christmas approaches, debate often arises over when exactly Jesus was born. Did the Nativity really happen during winter in Bethlehem just over 2,020 years ago? Recent research by a group of Italian researchers suggests that it did.

Liberato De Caro, Ph.D., of the Institute of Crystallography of the National Research Council in Bari, Italy, who led the research, proposes that the date of Jesus’ birth can be ascertained through an understanding of the Jewish pilgrimages that took place at that time, and how their connections with Mary’s visit to Elizabeth — and Mary’s reaction to Elizabeth expecting John the Baptist, and the death of Herod the Great — point to the date of Jesus’ birth taking place in December 1 BC. . . .

All this implies that the Annunciation should have happened at least five months after a pilgrimage feast. Since the intervals between Passover and Pentecost, and between the latter and the Feast of the Tabernacles are less than five months, it follows that the period in which to place the Annunciation is the period between the Feast of the Tabernacles and Passover, and that the angel’s visit to Mary must necessarily fall very close and just before Passover.  The Jewish Passover began the liturgical year and fell in the first full moon of spring — normally at the end of March, beginning of April. If we add the nine months of the duration of a pregnancy we arrive at the end of December, the beginning of January. Consequently, the Nativity could actually have taken place during the period of the year handed down through the centuries by the Tradition of the Churches of the West and the East. . . .

Ultimately, based on the most accurate analysis possible today of the visibility to the naked eye of the lunar eclipses, the search for one that may have actually been visible in Judea 2,000 years ago, placed in relation to other chronological and historical elements deduced from the writings of Josephus Flavius and Roman history, leads to a single possible solution — namely, a dating of the death of Herod the Great occurring in AD 2-3, compatible with the conventional beginning of the Christian era — i.e., the Nativity occurred at the end of the year 1 BC.

The president of Bayer’s Pharmaceuticals Division told international “experts” during a globalist health conference that the mRNA COVID-19 shots are indeed “cell and gene therapy” marketed as “vaccines” to be palatable to the public.

Stefan Oelrich, president of Bayer’s Pharmaceuticals Division, made these comments at this year’s World Health Summit, which took place in Berlin from October 24-26 and hosted 6,000 people from 120 countries. Oelrich told his fellow international “experts” from academia, politics, and the private sector that the novel mRNA COVID “vaccines” are actually “cell and gene therapy” that would have otherwise been rejected by the public if not for a “pandemic” and favorable marketing.

“We are really taking that leap [to drive innovation] – us as a company, Bayer – in cell and gene therapies … ultimately the mRNA vaccines are an example for that cell and gene therapy. I always like to say: if we had surveyed two years ago in the public – ‘would you be willing to take a gene or cell therapy and inject it into your body?’ – we probably would have had a 95% refusal rate,” stated Oelrich. . . .

Oelrich’s words echo a similar agenda as the infamous “Great Reset,” a radical socialist plan designed by globalist elites, gathering at the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, Switzerland once a year, which “seeks to ‘push the reset button’ on the global economy.”

An Indiana insurance executive dropped a bombshell statistic during an end-of-year virtual news conference, reporting a “stunning” 40% increase in the death rate among 18- to 64-year-old adults compared to pre-pandemic levels.

During the same call, OneAmerica’s CEO Scott Davison also described a major uptick in both short- and long-term disability claims.

The insurance executive rated the extraordinarily high death rate as “the highest … we have seen in the history of this business,” adding the trend is “consistent across every player in that business.”

To further underscore the import of his statements, Davison said, “Just to give you an idea of how bad [40%] is, a … one-in-200 catastrophe would be a 10% increase over pre-pandemic. So 40% is just unheard of.”

Contrary to what the public might assume — given the media’s unremitting coverage of COVID-19 — Davison reported most of the death claims listed causes of death other than COVID.

Commenting on the news, Steve Kirsch, executive director of the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation, wrote, “It would take something REALLY BIG to have an effect this big.”

Moreover, Kirsch said, the culprit would have to be something first introduced in 2021 — “something new … that a huge number of people would be exposed to” — such as COVID shots.

Early in 2017, Reuters reported that many Americans seem incapable of independent thinking.  In all likelihood, some of this problem can be chalked up to the fact that students are all taught the same thing and in the same way in the nation’s public schools.       

“The current Covid-19 vaccinations are no more effective at preventing Covid than Robitussin is [at] preventing a person from catching the common cold,” were the words spoken to Real Raw News by a former CDC research scientist who in October was fired for questioning agency protocol.

The source, who we’ll call Larry to protect his anonymity, had worked for the Deep State-funded agency for 12 years and was responsible for curating vaccine trial reports that Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson had sent the CDC for analysis and record keeping.

It was clear from the start, he said, that the CDC’s intent was to bury or misrepresent adverse reaction reports while pressuring Trump’s Covid-19 Task Force into believing that clinical trial results, which Big Pharma falsified, showed >95% efficacy at preventing a person from contracting the China virus. Big Pharma collectively injected the clot shot into the arms of 50,000 clinical trial participants; another 47,000 received placebos. Two percent—an alarming number–of the 50,000 developed severe adverse reactions to include myocarditis and pericarditis within 21 days of having received either their first or second jab.

Moreover, 85% of trial participants who got the medication and were intentionally exposed to Sars-Cov2 tested positive for Covid-19 within 4-14 days of having been exposed to the virus. In short, the vaccinations seemed to protect only 15% of recipients.

“The level of deception is shocking. But fact is, we can’t even trust the 15% figure, because with every disease, a segment of the population will have an inherent or natural immunity. . . . They’re all in this together. So, when the CDC got the trial statistics, they had to muddy them. . . .

“The CDC knew early on, from the outbreak in Italy, that Covid-19 did not seriously sicken people who are generally healthy. . . .

Prior to the genesis of Trump’s ill-conceived Operation Warp Speed, members of the CDC, NIH, FDA, and Big Pharma routinely held clandestine meetings to discuss ways of deceiving a potentially wary public to accept a fictitious narrative—get vaccinated or die—devised before vaccine trials had been completed. . . .

“It’s my opinion that there’s been a collaborative effort to pump that poison into as many people as possible regardless of how effective it is. Right now, the majority of people hospitalized have had one, two, or three shots. There are more vaccinated than unvaccinated in the hospitals. That is telling. The vaccines were never meant to stop Covid-19,” Larry said.

The most vociferous proponent of ["vaccine"] mandates is Sonia Sotomayor, an Obama appointee who last week falsely claimed that 100,000 American children are currently hospitalized with Covid-19. Her claim was so outrageously specious that even her MSM and CDC allies were quick to refute it.

But it is not the first time Sotomayor misused her platform. Whereas a SCJ’s function is to unbiasedly interpret the law, Sotomayor often subverts it by infusing a noxious mixture of opinion and attitude into her judicial rulings. Prior to receiving ethics complaints, she promoted social justice reform and medical mandates on her now vacuous Twitter account.

Worse, she’s the worst kind of hypocrite.

Unlike her colleagues, Sotomayor, who has said she’s been vaccinated and boosted, is not hearing arguments in the courtroom. Rather, she cowers in her office and, double masked, broadcasts her pudgy face over ZOOM into the courtroom. She has said she does this for fear of catching Covid.

The truth, at least according to former law clerks and unpaid interns of Sotomayor’s, is that Sotomayor is unvaccinated and could justifiably be called an anti-vaxxer.

Penny Sampson is a 24-year-old law student who was accepted into the Supreme Court internship program in Spring of 2021, just before it began a moratorium due to the Plandemic. Her responsibilities at the Office of the Clerk included responding to case-related inquiries from attorneys and litigants, both in-person and on the telephone, and assisting the full-time Clerk’s Office employees with a wide variety of tasks, including the processing and maintenance of Court filings and records. The internship also put her in sporadic contact with Sotomayor. . . .

“I asked permission to leave the offices early on a Wednesday, so I could get vaccinated, and since I have, well, underlying health issues, I qualified for Phase I distribution. Anyway, I bumped into Justice Sotomayor on my way out. We had two personal conversations before, so I told her I was on my way to get vaccinated. That’s when she gave me a funny look and said something I never would have expected,” Ms. Sampson told Real Raw News.

Sotomayor, she said, cautioned her against getting vaccinated.

“I can’t quote what she said verbatim because we’re talking 18 months ago. The gist of it was that I was young and thin and probably wouldn’t get sick and not need a vaccination. I very politely asked if she’s been vaccinated, and it was my understanding all the Justices were, but she answered aloofly, saying something like I shouldn’t make health decisions based on what someone else does. I told her I had diabetes—it’s an untruth that all people with diabetes are overweight—and she told me I still shouldn’t get vaccinated. She said she was looking out for me, and we parted ways. I had an intuitive feeling she wasn’t vaccinated, and for whatever reason, didn’t want me to get vaccinated, even though I later did,” Ms. Sampson went on. . . .

Between 2020-2021, Mark Cull, an alias, was one of eight law clerks that had worked under Sotomayor during that period.  He asked to remain anonymous fearing that speaking openly might derail potential employment opportunities.

In February 2021, Mr. Cull overheard a telephone conversation between Sotomayor and the Evil One, Barack Hussein Obama.  Although Mr. Cull did not hear Obama’s voice, he is certain it was him because Sotomayor kept addressing the caller as “Mr. President” and at the conclusion of the call said, “Give my best to Michelle.”

“Justice Sotomayor was on the phone 20 minutes or so. At one point, she got silent a moment, then said ‘Yes, I’ve been warned already. I’m not taking the vaccine, and neither is my family, and, yes, I’ll be extremely judicious who I advise.’  I was at my desk in the vestibule outside her office, and she probably paid me no mind because I’d had earbuds in my ears with the music off.  It was clear to me that something had to be wrong with the vaccine. That’s why I’m still unvaccinated,” Mr. Cull said.

In closing, it’s painfully apparent that Sotomayor, like most devious Democrats, has a public and private face. On one side, she’s advocating that every American citizen get vaccinated; on the other, she’s not only avoiding getting vaccinated herself but also advising her colleagues and family to follow her lead.

If you have been following the Alternative Media for any period of time now, seeking for the truth to combat the deception and lies that are coming from the pharma-funded corporate news media, you have undoubtedly heard testimonies from victims of the COVID-19 shots begin their testimony with the assertion: “I am not an anti-vaxxer.”

The presupposition that most of these people have, whether doctors or members of the public who were fooled into taking one of the COVID-19 gene-alerting shots, is that vaccines are generally safe and effective, but the COVID-19 shots are not, and should not even be called “vaccines” because they don’t meet the historical definition of a “vaccine.”

For example, a recent post by a medical doctor who confessed that they had never bothered to really research the vaccine issue in the past, and has come to realize that there is no science at all behind the COVID-19 shots, and has been banned on specific social media platforms for daring to question the COVID-19 vaccine narrative, wrote this:

Please, let me be clear: I am not commenting here on the safety or effectiveness of any vaccines, nor whether I think it’s smart or otherwise to get yourself or your children vaccinated. Of course, being vaccinated with a product that is safe in and of itself and effective at preventing an infection that can cause you long-term damage, is a very good thing. It’s a miracle. There is basically no-one on earth arguing otherwise, I promise you.

Well, that is a false promise, because myself and many others have exposed the false narrative of the entire vaccine industry for decades now.

Science has never been on the side of the vaccine peddlers. They have never been proven to be either safe, or effective.

Since I have covered this issue for over a decade now, I am going to summarize in this article why those of us who have put in the long hours of research over the many years on just how evil the vaccine industry is, feel like vomiting or screaming at our computer monitors, every time someone wants to complain about how bad the COVID-19 shots are but feels compelled to begin their testimonies with the phrase “I am not an anti-vaxxer.”

Well I AM an anti-vaxxer, and I am PROUD to wear that label, and not ashamed. . . .

The one mantra that has been drilled into the public psyche for decades now is this:

The science on vaccines is settled. The consensus of the scientific community is that vaccines are safe and effective.
. . .

The statement that “the science is settled” is illogical and contradictory, because the very nature of science is one of discovery, developing hypotheses, testing those hypotheses, and then revising them as more data becomes available.

That is the true nature of “science,” and it is never settled.

This is, in fact, one of the main foundational problems with the false narrative surrounding vaccines: the misuse of the word “science.” The meaning of “science” has been hijacked and perverted by Big Pharma over the years to come to basically mean “authoritarianism.”

Almost everything they now claim is based on “science” is really just an appeal to authority (it is true because we have declared it to be true), and has very little, if any, relationship to the factual evidence.

As I wrote yesterday, this is why one can share all the data in the VAERS that points to the obvious conclusion that the COVID-19 shots are causing more adverse events than all vaccines given out for the past 30+ years, and people who are pro-vaccine will still not believe it, not because the facts don’t contradict their belief, but because someone else they have a higher opinion about as a perceived authority figure, told them it is not true, and the fact that they could examine the evidence for themselves and draw their own conclusions never even crosses their mind most of the time. . . .

They try to get away from this obviously false statement by labeling any doctor or scientist who does not agree with their views on vaccines as “quacks,” even if they are well-published with high credentials and long distinguished careers.

It doesn’t matter. To even question the vaccine cult dogma is to risk your reputation and career. . . .

In short, the claim that “vaccines are safe and effective” . . . cannot be proven scientifically, and the actual evidence points in the opposite direction.

“Life smarts” is very different from book knowledge

We have conflated abstract thinking with intelligence.  But those with high IQ are not necessarily “life smart.”  In fact they are often “life dumb,” showing an inability to be empathic, socially skilled, or wise.

It’s hard for us in the U.S. to understand what real intelligence is.  We have succumbed to the notion that intelligence can be measured by "book knowledge" and test scores.  Book knowledge typically separates the world of knowing into bits and pieces, facts and factoids, isolated phenomena. But this super-knowledge of facts is not real intelligence.  It’s often not even real knowledge, which involves solving real-world problems with what you know.  Knowing facts, using logic, and conscious reasoning represent part of intellect, a tiny aspect of real intelligence.  It is necessary but not sufficient for life smarts or wisdom.

Michael Polanyi (1958) and Mary Midgley (1992) have pointed out how intellect actually narrows understanding. Thinking too much makes you believe that thinking is what intelligence is about.  Real intelligence involves personal knowledge, extending yourself into something, and knowing that thing as itself. . . .

Real intelligence includes social-relational intelligence.  It is intellectual and emotional.  It is using intellect in a way that treats others with deep respect. . . .

Those with only intellect or book knowledge sometimes behave in ways that indicate that they don’t really know what they are doing to the relational, diverse, and cooperative world we live in. . . .

People with high intellect who have lost or never developed a sense of caring connection to all of life can be dangerous when they have power over others (with guns, money, influence).  Let’s stop calling them geniuses.